🍟 5/26/2022 – What Happened To Quiznos?

A FRANCHISE TALE

What Happened To Quiznos?

At it’s peak in 2007, the Quiznos franchise had close to 5,000 locations and was doing roughly $2 billion in annual revenue.

Fast-forward to today, and they have less than 200 stores and can’t stop the bleeding.

Here’s how the toasted sub empire collapsed:

The Beginning of Quiznos

In 1978, business partners Jimmy Lambatos and Todd Disner started a fine dining restaurant in Denver, called Footers. While running that restaurant, they had the idea to launch another concept – this time, it’d be an Italian style deli.

The partners used Footers as a testing ground for what would become staples of the Quiznos menu – including the baguettes, dressings, and other ingredients. 

In 1981, Lambatos and DIsner opened the original Quiznos location.

The concept was an immediate hit, and local customers especially fell in love with Quiznos unusual method of toasting each sandwich. Doing so not only melted the cheese on sandwiches, but it also enhanced the flavors. 

When they began franchising, Quiznos became the first business to toast at scale. This is why Quiznos to this day still calls themself the “home of the toasted sub”.

Quiznos Franchise Rise

By 1991, ten years after the first Quiznos opened, the brand was up to 18 total locations, mostly in the Colorado area.

That’s when Lambatos and Disner decided to SOLD the company to local franchisee Rick Schaden, a 26 year old whose father (also named Rick Schaden) helped fund a few Quiznos franchises. 

When the Schaden’s took over, they wanted growth. To do so, they built infrastructure to support franchise owners via training, marketing support, operations, and more. 

2 years later, Quiznos had doubled their store footprint to 40 locations in multiple states. Then in 1994, the Schaden’s took Quiznos public and raised $4 million dollars in an IPO.

These funds enabled them to accelerate growth far quicker, and by year 2000 the toasted sub empire had expanded to 1,000 locations. 

This is when Quiznos made a fateful decision to form a subsidiary.

American Food Distributors

American Food Distributors is the company that Quiznos mandated all franchisees had to buy their food and paper products through.

All of a sudden, the Schaden realized that by upcharing the goods that AFD sold, they could make way more money by supplying franchisees with goods than from earning royalties. 

In peak years, it was reported that American Food Distributors made $200 million in revenue, while royalty revenue was roughly ~$70 million.

The hefty profits they were making was able to fuel even more growth, and Quiznos was able to hit 2,000 locations by 2003. 

While on the surface things looked great, franchise owners were beginning to voice concerns.

The Beginning of the Quiznos Collapse

Franchisees were being mandated via national promotions to offer low prices, but they had to pay above market prices on their food and paper goods. 

To make matters worse, Subway entered the toasted sub game in 2004, which destroyed pretty much the only moat Quiznos had. Despite this, Quiznos was still able to grow for a few more years, eventually hitting 5,000 stores by 2007.

But in that year, hundreds of franchisees banded together and sued Quiznos for the markups on their food supplies and mandated retail prices that made it virtually impossible to turn a profit. 

When the great recession hit in 2008, the already struggling stores began to shutter, and 2,000 stores had closed by 2012.

The Franchise Death Spiral

The store closures a death spiral that couldn’t be stopped. Less stores meant less franchisee revenue going to their marketing fund, which made the system weaker as a whole. 

With already super tight margins, it was too much for existing store owners to handle, and closures continued. 

A majority stake buyout in 2012 by Avenel Capital Group wasn’t enough to save Quiznos, as they ultimately filed for bankruptcy in 2014 – reporting $875 million dollars in debt!

The franchisee lawsuits came to a head and Quiznos ended up paying $200 million dollars to compensate existing owners, and another lawsuit for $95 million dollars for franchisees who couldn’t even open. 

This is a prime example of the negative side of franchising – while the franchise model can be amazing when it works, it goes the opposite direction too. 

Quiznos clearly lost focus on supporting franchisees as partners, and instead became an expensive food distributor that treated them as customers. 

A quote from a former franchisee sums it up:

“What they’re doing is criminal. I lost my savings. I lost my wife. I cashed in my life insurance policy. I lost everything, but I’m so happy to just be out of it”

Where is Quiznos Now?

In 2018, Quiznos was purchased by private equity firm High Bluff Capital partners. At that time, the franchise had about 300 locations open, whereas today it is less than 200.

Judging from their franchise website, their royalties are priced competitively, but only the current surviving franchise owners can say if the supplies are finally priced fairly…

Disclaimer: This Content is for informational purposes only, you should not construe any such information or other material as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice. Nothing contained on this site constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer to buy or sell any franchises, securities, or other financial instruments in this or in any other jurisdiction in which such solicitation or offer would be unlawful under the franchise and/or securities laws of such jurisdiction.

All Content in this email is information of a general nature and does not address the detailed circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Nothing in the email constitutes professional and/or financial advice, nor does any information in the email constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other Content in this email before making any decisions based on such information or other Content.